Propaganda Press
Flailing over Amelia Earhart
Here we go again. In what looks for all the world like
desperation on the part of our national opinion molding apparatus, theyÕve
revived the story that some bones and parts of a skull found in 1940 on the small
remote island of Nikumaroro (Gardner Island) belonged
to the famous aviator, Amelia Earhart, who was lost in the Pacific, along with
navigator Fred Noonan, on a trip around the world in 1937. Those bones had been examined long ago
and it was determined that they belonged to a male who was shorter than Earhart
and have long since been lost, but now, would you believe, through the miracle
of modern computer techniques, a single professor emeritus ÒexpertÓ is telling
us that those lost bones were almost certainly Amelia EarhartÕs. On top of that, this new ÒdiscoveryÓ got
saturation coverage right across the permitted political spectrum from Fox News to National Public Radio.
Just on the face of it, you might think that
this was some kind of experiment to test the limits of the gullibility of the
American public. Anyone with an
ounce of gumption can see that what the guy is telling us is preposterous. WhatÕs
really happening is that the official story that Earhart and Noonan simply got
lost and, running out of gas, either plunged into the ocean or got marooned on
that island where they crash landed, is finally completely falling
apart—thanks in large measure to the dogged work of Mike Campbell, author
of Amelia
Earhart: The Truth at Last—and theyÕre now pulling out all the stops
in a last-gasp effort to salvage it.
The major precipitating event for this new story was likely the
announcement coming out of Saipan, located very near to the U.S. territory of
Guam, that plans are afoot to erect a monument there to Earhart, because that
is where she died as a captive of the Japanese. The biggest problem with that
for the establishment protectors of the giant falsehood about EarhartÕs demise
is that the monument planners see the Earhart monument, to be located near
their international airport, as a tourist attraction for the island. It would be sort of like the tourist attracton of the Anne Frank house in Amsterdam,
with the big exception being that the Earhart monument would be based upon
historical fact while the Anne Frank story is, from the best evidence, historical fiction. Imagine how effective such a monument
would be for bypassing the establishment opinion molders over the long haul.
Starting on the left of the permitted political
spectrum among the floggers of the incredible new story, we find National Public Radio. If you didnÕt know before how thoroughly
dishonest that news operation is, please notice that they make reference to the
recent History Channel special that featured a photograph that purported to
show Earhart and Noonan on a dock on Jaluit Atoll in
the Marshall Islands and link that to its supposed debunking by a Japanese
blogger. What they donÕt do is to
make any mention of the subsequent debunking of the ÒdebunkerÓ by the Marshall
Islands authorities, which is the subject of my article, ÒÕEarhart PhotoÕ Debunker Debunked?Ó NPR, like the rest of the mainstream
press, dummied up about that:
One example of the dummying up is particularly
poignant to me since it has some connection to my own formal education. Back in March, my alma mater Davidson
College (which also happens to be the alma mater of the late Clinton White
House counsel, Vince Foster) offered a free online two-week course on the subject of fake
news. One of their contributing
ÒexpertsÓ was National Public Radio (NPR) reporter Camila Domonoske,
also a Davidson graduate. Here we
can watch one of her contributions to the course,
explaining why the Òfake newsÓ term has almost lost all meaning.
She makes some good points, but I think we can
agree, though, that if the Marshall Islands officials are correct, the widely
disseminated report that the key photograph in the History Channel Earhart
presentation had to have been made in 1935 or before is not true. That is to
say, what was widely reported as news has turned out to be, in fact, fake
news.
As it happens, the reporter who put out this
fake news for NPR online very quickly in the wake of the story from The Guardian was young Camila Domonoske, herself. I can find no indication online that NPR
or The Guardian or any other news
organ has retracted its Japanese-debunker story or has clarified it in any way
in light of the latest Marshall Islands revelations, so we may now accuse them
all of trading in fake news on the disappearance of Amelia Earhart.
The Washington Post with its big Earhart story also made reference to
the History Channel special and its supposed subsequent debunking, without
mentioning the further revelations from the Marshall Islands. It should be clear at this point that
the whole History Channel hullabaloo was a set-up and that they already had
their ÒdebunkingÓ information in hand, or they would have never run the story
about the photograph in the first place.
With this latest story, the propagandists are
returning to the familiar pattern of Òexperts,Ó often wielding computer models,
versus citizen eyewitnesses. Some outstanding
examples of this genre come readily to mind, the first being that of TWA 800. Scores of
witnesses saw a missile streaking up toward the airplane, but the CIA produced
a computer-generated video that purported to show how the stricken airplane
itself soared upward after an internal explosion, somehow fooling all the
witnesses, and that was the story that the public was told. ABC News in 2003 turned to experts with
computers to ÒproveÓ that all those people who heard or saw shots fired from
the area of the grassy knoll and the witnesses to JFKÕs autopsy were all wrong. More recently the hotshots at the
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) trotted out a computer simulation to show us that the
9/11 controlled demolition of Building 7 that we can all see clearly was not
that at all, but a spontaneous building collapse caused by a small fire in one
corner of the building. And in a
much lesser known case, with no computer use involved, the authorities and the
press were able to conceal the likely assassination of the great Trappist monk,
Thomas Merton, by simply concealing the observations of key witnesses in far
off Thailand, where the death occurred.
Hugh Turley and I have uncovered that witness testimony in our new book,
The Martyrdom of Thomas Merton: An Investigation.
Then, of course, thereÕs the
infamous USS Liberty attack, where
all the witnesses are on one side and the official government conclusion is on
the other.
Mike Campbell and Les Kinney Close Ranks
In the Earhart case what we have is numerous
witnesses who saw Earhart and Noonan, and their airplane and even EarhartÕs
briefcase, on Saipan, where the aviators were brought after their capture in
the Marshall Islands far to the east, and more witnesses who saw them in the
Marshall Islands ranged against a group of phony ÒexpertsÓ who fashion
themselves as The International Group for Historical Aircraft Recovery
(TIGHAR). HereÕs a sample of what
Mike Campbell has to say about that outfitÕs latest work:
The claim
that Amelia EarhartÕs bones were found on Nikumaroro
has been long discredited and exposed as fraudulent; this idea is nothing but
more hype and fake news from TIGHAR and their media toadies across the
mainstream media. Further, this latest media blitz
has surely been coordinated by those in Washington who do not want to
see an Earhart memorial on Saipan, and such is their anger that they have
activated more than the usual handful of media organizations to spread the
latest TIGHAR manure across the land. The timing is too coincidental to be
anything else. This new installment of the Òlost bonesÓ lie
is nothing more than a thinly veiled response to the recent
announcement about the plans to build the Saipan Earhart Memorial Monument.
Weasel words
like Òcould have,Ó ÒlikelyÓ and Ò99 percent probabilityÓ season the latest
recycled TIGHAR trash, but at bottom, itÕs nothing but smoke,
mirrors and lies, as usual, from TIGHAR and those in the media who aid and
abet their phony schemes. I ask those who believe in real science
— not discredited fantasies like Òremote viewingÓ — to study the
facts that Earhart researchers have complied for nearly 60 years, and you
cannot come to any other conclusion than Amelia and Fred
NoonanÕs tragic and unnecessary deaths on Saipan.
Murderers are
sent to their executions daily on the smallest fraction of the evidence
presented in several books since Fred GoernerÕs 1966
bestseller ÒThe
Search for Amelia EarhartÓ solidly established the presence and deaths of Earhart and Fred
Noonan on Saipan following their loss in July 1937, and inspired thousands
of Americans to demand action from Congress to reveal the truth, which was
thoroughly ignored. The additional mountain of evidence I present in ÒAmelia Earhart: The Truth at LastÓ and in my blog, www.EarhartTruth.com to
support the Marshalls and Saipan truth brings together GoernerÕs
work and that of several other fine researchers and leaves no other conclusion than
Saipan. If TIGHAR had the tiniest molecule of this evidence to support their
false claims, the Earhart Òmystery,Ó would have been declared
ÒsolvedÓ decades ago.
The
major problem with the Earhart story is that the American public has been told
unceasingly for 80 years that her disappearance is a Ògreat aviation
mystery,Ó to the point that this canard has become part of our cultural
furniture, blindly accepted without question by nearly everyone. In fact, the U.S. government
knows exactly what happened to the fliers and simply refuses to admit it. I
will not expand on this basic truth here, however, as anyone unafraid to
learn the truth can easily find it. Although the truth about the Earhart
disappearance is a sacred cow in Washington, itÕs also an open
secret, available to anyone who desires to find, learn and
understand.
Les Kinney is the
researcher who found the controversial photograph in the National Archives that
he says, in contrast with Campbell, show Earhart and Noonan on Jaluit Atoll.
He takes apart the latest TIGHAR claims a good deal more comprehensively
than does Campbell. His
observations can be read at ÒLes Kinney joins the ÔTruth at LastÕ conversation,
Shreds TIGHARÕs latest false Earhart claimsÓ at Mike CampbellÕs web site.
David Martin
March 15, 2018
See also: ÒHillary
Clinton and the Amelia Earhart Cover-up,Ó
ÒAmelia Earhart Truth Versus the Establishment,Ó ÒPress
Touts Dubious Earhart Photo,Ó ÒEarhart
Photo Story Apparently Debunked,Ó ÒÕEarhart
PhotoÕ Debunker Debunked?Ó and ÒWikipediaÕs
Greatest Misses.Ó
Home Page Column Column 5 Archive Contact