Press Touts Dubious
Earhart Photo
For three quarters of a century AmericaÕs press
and its court historians have studiously ignored the voluminous evidence that
aviation adventurer Amelia Earhart and her navigator, Fred Noonan, were
captured by the Japanese and did not just mysteriously crash into the Pacific
Ocean on her round-the-world venture. *
Now, across the board, from NBC,
CBS,
ABC,
Fox,
CNN,
to The
Washington Post and the Associated
Press, they all seem to have made a 180-degree turn based upon the supposed
discovery of one very ambiguous photograph in the National Archives. What, we have to wonder, is going on?
The
New York Times,
jumping the gun with its more skeptical approach, gives us a very big
clue. The headline says it all,
ÒDid Amelia Earhart Survive? A
Found Photo Offers a Theory, but No Proof.Ó Already, The Times is beginning to cast doubt upon the significance, if not
the authenticity, of this photograph.
What is more than likely happening is that our
propaganda press is changing its strategy in defense of the official
crashed-and-sank line. What they are apparently using now is a combination of a #4
and a #9 in the Seventeen
Techniques for Truth Suppression. They are ÒKnock down straw menÓ and ÒCome
half clean.Ó The upcoming History
Channel program that features the photograph will probably leave the
knocking down to be done by other photo-examining Òexperts.Ó
It
reminds me quite a bit of the work that the fake critic, journalist Christopher Ruddy,
did in the Vince Foster death case concerning FosterÕs presumed Òsuicide note.Ó
Ruddy found three handwriting experts who pronounced it a forgery. Kenneth
Starr came back in his final report with his own expert who said that Foster
wrote it. The dueling experts will only lead us down a blind alley, and the
next time someone mentions that the Japanese might have captured Amelia Earhart,
the average person will think that such Òwild speculationÓ was based entirely
on this specious bit of evidence.
When
it comes to experts on the disappearance of Amelia Earhart, there is one that
we should listen to above all others.
That is Mike Campbell, the author of Amelia
Earhart: The Truth at Last.
Here is his take on the photograph:
July 9 Earhart
special to feature bogus photo claims
On
Wednesday morning, July 5, I awoke to the long-anticipated news
that an unclassified photo found at the National Archives in College
Park, Md., by researcher Les Kinney that reflected Jaluit
Harbor in the Marshall Islands, date possibly late 1930s but not known, would
indeed be the centerpiece of the History ChannelÕs July 9 special, ÒAmelia
Earhart: The Lost Evidence.Ó NBC News apparently had the
TV network news exclusive on this story, but others were
soon also breathlessly touting the photo, as if it were truly the
Holy Grail in the Earhart case. To see the initial NBC video and story, please click here.
This would be great news if the claim that Amelia Earhart, Fred
Noonan and the Earhart Electra are in the photo were true, because we know that
the doomed fliers were in the Marshalls, were taken to Jaluit and later to Kwajalein and Saipan, where they died
in Japanese hands. Several researchers and authors, whose work
can be easily found on this site, have presented mountains
of evidence to this effect. But
this photo isnÕt ÒevidenceÓ of anything except that Koshu was at Jaluit Harbor
(large ship in right background) when it was taken, and might have had an
unidentifiable airplane on its stern. Interesting, but hardly what our
ÒexpertsÓ are telling us. In fact, this photo does little except discredit
the truth, which, in my view, is the goal of this current
exercise, along with ratings and making money, of course.
(To read the rest of the article, go to Amelia Earhart: The Truth at Last.)
* For a summary of that evidence and the press
(and Wikipedia) treatment of it, see ÒHillary Clinton and the Amelia
Earhart Cover-up,Ó ÒAmelia
Earhart Truth Versus the Establishment,Ó and ÒWikipediaÕs Greatest Misses.Ó
David Martin
July 7, 2017
Home Page
Columns
Column 5 Archive Contact